The Moderating Effect of Benevolence on the influence of Corporate Governance on Audit Quality

Sailendra Sailendra, Etty Murwaningsari, Sekar Mayangsari, Murtanto Murtanto


In this study, we aim to examine the influence of corporate governance on the audit quality of financial report moderated by benevolence. The research data consisted of 320 observations from 80 public listed companies in the manufacturing industry from 2013-2016. The research model has been tested using a data pool, with statistics on Structural Equalization Modeling - Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS). The results of the study get empirical evidence that corporate governance has a positive effect on audit quality. While benevolence as an independent variable has a negative impact on audit quality, however, benevolence as a moderating variable strengthens the influence of corporate governance on audit quality. Likewise, SIZE as control variables have a positive effect on audit quality, but ROA no impact on audit quality and LEV have a negative impact on audit quality. The result of this study have implications for investors, company management and regulators, that good corporate governance is inseparable from the benevolence of management in managing the company as a way to improve audit quality, is something essential and needs attention from all parties.


Corporate governance, audit quality, benevolence, size, leverage

Full Text:



AICPA. (1978). The Commission on Auditor’s Responsibilities: Report, Conclusions, and Recommendations. New York, NY: American Institute of Certified Public Accountant (AICPA). Ang, C. H., & Lim, K. T. C. (2008). Who left the gates unlocked? Reconciling the duties of auditors and company directors. Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 20, 171–194. Aschauer, E., Fink, M., Moro, A., van Bakel-Auer, K., & Warming-Rasmussen, B. (2016). Trust and Professional Skepticism in the Relationship between Auditors and Clients: Overcoming the Dichotomy Myth. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 29(1), 19–42. Beasley, M. S., & Petroni, K. R., (2001). Board independence and audit-firm type. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(1), 97–114. Beisland, L. A., Mersland, R., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2015). Audit Quality and Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Microfinance Industry. International Journal of Auditing, 19(3), 218–237. Cadbury. (1993). The Report of the Cadbury Committee on The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance: The Code of Best Practice. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 1(3), 124–124. Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L., & Riley, R. A. (2010). Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), 365–384. Chang, Y.-S., Chi, W., Hwang, L.-J., & Shiue, M.-J. (2015). The Association between Corporate Governance and Audit Quality: Evidence from Taiwan. In S. Susela Devi & K. Hooper (Eds.), Accounting in Asia (Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, Vol. 11) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 129– 153. Chen, S., Sun, S. Y. J. & Wu, D. (2010). Client Importance, Institutional Improvements, and Audit Quality in China: An Office and Individual Auditor Level Analysis. The Accounting Review, 85(1), 127–158. Chu, L., Mathieu, R., & Mbagwu, C. (2009). The Impact of Corporate Governance and Audit Quality on the Cost of Private Loans. Accounting Perspectives, 8(4), 277–304. Collier, P., & Gregory, A. (1996). Audit Committee Effectiveness and the Audit Fee. The European Accounting Review, 5(2), 177–198. DeAngelo, L. E., (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. Eilifsen, A., & Willekens, M., (2008). In the name of trust: Some thoughts about trust, audit quality and audit regulation in Europe. In Auditing, Trust and Governance (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge. Ejeagbasi, G. E., Nweze, A. U., Ezeh, E. C., & Nze, D. O. (2015). Corporate Governance and Audit Quality in Nigeria: Evidence from The Banking Industry. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, 5(1), 18– 39.

Garrett, J., Hoitash, R., & Prawitt, D. F. (2014). Trust and Financial Reporting Quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(5), 1087–1125. Gul, A., & Leung, S., (2004). Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23, 351–379. Hageman, A. M., & Fisher, D. G. (2016). The Influence of Client Attributes and Organizational Climate on Tax Professionals. In Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting: Vol. 20. Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting (Vol. 20, pp. 31–66). Husnin, A., Nawawi, A. and Puteh Salin, A. (2016), "Corporate governance and auditor quality – Malaysian evidence", Asian Review of Accounting, Vol. 24 No. 2. pp. 1-24. Imhoff Jr, E. A. (2003). Accounting Quality, Auditing, and Corporate Governance. Accounting Horizons, 17, 117–128. IOD. (2017). The 2017 Good Governance Report: The great governance debate continued. London: Institute of Directors. Kim, D., Ferrin, D., & Rao, R., (2003). Antecedents of Consumer Trust in B-to-C Electronic Commerce. AMCIS Proceeding, 21, 157–167. Available at: Lee, H. Y., & Jahng, G. J. (2008). Determinants of audit report lag: Evidence from Korea - An examination of auditor-related factors. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 24(2), 27–44. Lee, T., Ali, Md. A., & Gloeck, J. D. (2008). A study of auditors’ responsibility for fraud detection in Malaysia. South African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research, 8, 27–34. Lennox, C., (2005). Management ownership and audit firm size. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(1), 205–227. Lin, J. W., & Hwang, M. I. (2010). Audit Quality, Corporate Governance, and Earnings Management: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 14(1), 57–77. Lin, Z. J. and Liu, M. (2009), “The impact of corporate governance on auditor choice: Evidence from China”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 44-59. Makni, I., Kolsi, M. C., & Affes, H. (2012). The impact of corporate governance mechanisms on audit quality: Evidence from Tunisia. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 11(3), 48. Mautz, R. K., & Sharaf, H. A. (1961). The philosophy of auditing. Sarasota, Fla: American Accounting Association. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709. Ogbeibu, S., Senadjki, A., & Gaskin, J. (2018). The moderating effect of benevolence on the impact of organisational culture on employee creativity. Journal of Business Research, 90, 334–346.

Park, J. I., Shin, J. Y., & Suh, C. W. (2013). The effect of corporate governance on the audit fees and audit hours. Working Paper, The University of Chungbuk/Seoul National University. Rahman, K. M., & Bremer, M., (2016). Effective Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting in Japan. Asian Academic of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 12(1), 93–122. 12.S1.5. Riguen, R., Kachouri, M., & Jarboui, A. (2018). Book‐Tax Differences, Corporate Governance Effectiveness and Audit Quality: An Interactive Effects. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 29(4), 20–36. Sailendra, S., (2019). The influence of Corporate Governance and Audit Quality on Trusted in Financial Report moderated by Value Relevance (Dissertation). The University of Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia. Sailendra, S., Murwaningsari, E., & Mayangsari, S. (2019). The Influence of Free Float Shares and Audit Quality on Company Performance: Evidence from Indonesia. Audit Financiar, (2), 9. Schneider, B., White, S. S., & Paul, M. C. (1998). Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: Tests of a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 150–163. Velury, U., Reisch, J. T., & O’reilly, D. M. (2003). Institutional ownership and the selection of industry specialist auditors. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 21(1), 35–48. Yeoh, E., & Jubb, C., (2001). Governance and audit quality: Is there an association? Department of Accounting, University of Melbourne, Australia.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Applied Business and International Management

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter

Published by : Association of International Business & Professional Management
Editorial Office:
Association of International Business and Professional Management (AIBPM) JL. Kahuripan No. 9 Hotel Sahid Montana, Malang, Indonesia
+62 341 366222

ISSN 2614-7432 (Print)
ISSN 2621-2862 (Online)

International Journal of Applied Business and International Management INDEXED: