The Impact of Green Product Innovation, Green Perceived Quality to Purchase Intention Moderated by Lifestyle on Stainless Steel Straw

Lily Suhaily, Syarief Darmoyo, Sinta Boentoro, Eleonaora Anasthashia

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of green product innovation, green perceived quality to purchase intention moderated by lifestyle on stainless steel straw. There is a direct influence of green product innovation, green perceived quality, and life style to purchase intention. Lifestyle does not moderate the relationship between green product innovation and purchase intention. However, lifestyle moderates the relationship between green perceived quality and purchase intention. Based on the results, restaurants and cafes should use stainless steel straws because the consumers have a lifestyle with the perception that eco-friendly products can reduce the impact of environmental pollution therefore, they intend to visit restaurants and cafes that use stainless steel straws.

Keywords


Green Perceived Quality, Green Product Innovation, Lifestyle, Purchase Intention

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asshidin, N., Hazlin, N., Nurazariah, A., & Bashira, B. H. (2016). Perceived quality and emotional value that influence consumer’s purchase intention towards american and local products. Journal Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, 639 – 643.

Barry, J., & Weinstein, A. (2009). Business psychographics revisited: From segmentation theory to successful marketing practice. Journal of Marketing Management, 25 (3-4), 315-340.

Chang. & Fong. (2010). Green product quality, green customer satisfaction, green corporate image and green customer loyalty. African Journal of Business Management, 4(13), 2837-2842.

Chen, Y. S. (2011). Green organizational identity: sources and consequence. Management Decision, 49(3),384-404.

Chen, Y. S. (2010). The drivers of green brand equity: green brand image, green satisfaction, andgreen trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 307–319.

Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effect of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of Bussines Ethic, 14, 489-500.

Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Towards green trust: The influence of green perceive quality, green perceived risk, and green satisfaction. Management Decision, 51(1), 63-82.

Chiou, T. Y. Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 822-836,

Chuang, S. P., & Yang, C. L. (2014). Key success factors when implementing a green-manufacturing system. Production Planning & Control, 25 (11), 923-937

Datta, S. K. (2011). Pro-environmental concern influencing green buying: a study on Indianconsumers. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(6),124.

Diyah, I. A., & Wijaya. T. (2017). Determinant factors of purchase intention on green product. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 15(1), 54-62. Retrieved from: https://jurnaljam.ub.ac.id/index.php/jam/article/view/1040

Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1–19.

Ekawati, S. (2016). Mengkritisi kebijakan penanganan kantong plastik di Indonesia. Policy Brief Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial, Ekonomi, Kebijakan dan PerubahanI klim, Badan Penelitian, Pengembangan dan Inovasi Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, 16(6), 2-3.

Fraj, A., & Martinez. S. (2007).Family as a source of consumer-based brand equity.Journal pf Product & Brand Management, 6(3), 188-199.

Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004).Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115-134.

Gallo, T. et al., (2011). Accumulations of microplastic on shorelines worldwide: souces and sinks. Environmental Scienceand Technology, 45 (21): 9175-9179. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1021/es201811s.

Gan, C., Wee, H.Y., Ozanne, L. and Kao, T-H.(2008).Consumers purchasing behavior towards green products in New Zealand’, Innovative Marketing, 4(1), 93–102.

Gogoi, B. (2013). Study of antecedents of purchase intention and its effect on brand loyalty pf private label brand of apparel, International Journal of Sales & Marketing, 2(1), 267-271.

Hartmann, P. & Ibáñez, V. A. (2012). Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. Journal of Business Research, 65, 1254-1263.

Ho, H. T., & Olsen, S. V. (2012). Certainty, Risk and Knowledge in The Satisfaction-Purchase Intention Relationship in a New Product Experiment. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 241, 78-101.

Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation—new evidence from German panel data sources.Research policy,37(1), 163-173.

Jambeck, J. R. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347 (6223), 768-771.

Jansson, D., (2010), Development and characterisation of chitosan-plasmid DNA nanoparticles, Thesis, University of Technology, Tempere.

Kawa, L. W., Rahmadani, S. F., & Kumar, S. (2013). Factor affecting consumer decision making: A survey od young-adults on imported cosmetics in Jabodetabek , Indonesia. The SIJ Transaction on Industrial, Financial & Business Management (IFBM), 1(5), 175-179.

Magistris, T., & Gracia, A., (2008), The decision to buy organic food products in Southern Italy, Biritish Food Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited 110( 9), 929-947.

Netemeyer, R. G., Maxham, J.G. & Pullig, C. 2005. Conflicts in the work-family interface: links to job stress, customer service employee performance, and customer purchase intent. Journal of Marketing, 69 (2), 130-143.

Ocean Conservancy (2017). Together for our ocean: International coastal cleanup 2017 report. Washington, DC. Retrieved from: https://oceanconservancy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2017-Ocean-Conservancy-ICC-Report.pdf

Pooladireishahri, M., & Asgarpour, R. (2015). Does supplier’s willingness to customize influence the buyer’s retention? European Journal of Business and Management, 7(23), 91-98.

Ramayah, T., Lee, J. W. C., & Mohamad, O. (2010). Green product purchase intention: Some insights from a developing country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(12), 1419-1427.

Rashid, N. R. N. A. (2009). Awareness of eco-label in Malaysia’s green marketing initiative. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(8), 54-112.

Rizwan, et al., (2013). Measuring the Scope of green products in developing countries: A Myth Breaking Study, American Journal of Scientific Research, 85, 32-46.

Setadi, N. J. 2015. Perilaku konsumen (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Snoj, B., Korda. A. P., & Mumel D. (2004). The relationship among perceived quality, perceived risk and perceived product product value. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 13(2/3), 156-167.

Solomon, M. R. & Rabolt, N. 2009. Consumer Behaviour in Fashion (2nd Ed.). USA: Prentice Hall.

Soylu, K., & Dumville, J. C. (2011). Design for environment: The greening of product and supply chain. Maritime Economics & Logistics,13(1), 29-43

Triguero, A., Moreno-Mondéjar, & L.,Davia, M. A. (2013. Drivers of Different Types of Eco-Innovation in European SMEs. Ecological Economics, 92, 25-33.

Trisunaryati, W. (2018). Dari sampah plastik menjadi bensindan solar. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Verma, S. (2014). Psychological interventions in promoting sustainable consumption behaviour: anempirical study. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 8(4), 373-384.

Wu, S. I., and Chen, Y. J. (2014). The Impact of green marketing and perceived innovation on purchase intention for green products. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 6(5),1918-719.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v5i2.854

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Lily Suhaily, Syarief Darmoyo, Sinta Boentoro, Eleonaora Anasthashia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter

Published by : 

AIBPM Publisher

Editorial Office:

JL. Kahuripan No. 9 Hotel Sahid Montana, Malang, Indonesia
Phone:
+62 341 366222
Email: journal.ijabim@gmail.com (Administrator), 
           ijabimeditor@ejournal.aibpm.org (Editorial)
Website: http://www.ejournal.aibpm.org

Supported by: Association of International Business & Professional Management 

If you are interested to get the journal subscription you can contact us

ISSN 2614-7432 (Print)
ISSN 2621-2862 (Online)

DOI: Prefix 10.32535 by CrossREF

International Journal of Applied Business and International Management (IJABIM) INDEXED:

  

    

   

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.